Home : News : MPNews.net : Top News
about us | contact us | advertise | subscribe

HOME | WASHINGTON EVENING JOURNAL | FAIRFIELD DAILY LEDGER | MT. PLEASANT NEWS
| CLASSIFIEDS
  • Golden Triangle Newspapers
  • Washington Evening Journal
  • Fairfield Daily Ledger
  • Mt. Pleasant News
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds
  • Community
  • Fun and Games
  • Yellow Pages
  • Lifestyles
  • Links
  • The Golden Triangle
  • Email Subscription
  • American Profile
  • Guestbook
  • E-Edition
  • Display Ads



Calhouns object to eminent domain on quarry bridge
by Erik Owomoyela
02/03/2009
email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendly
From left: County Engineer Bill Belzer, Marilyn Calhoun, Dale Calhoun and Dave Calhoun. MPN photo by Erik Owomoyela.
From left: County Engineer Bill Belzer, Marilyn Calhoun, Dale Calhoun and Dave Calhoun. MPN photo by Erik Owomoyela.
The county's decision to begin eminent domain proceedings to acquire land for a replacement quarry bridge brought three members of the Calhoun family to the supervisors' office this morning, to make their case to the supervisors.

Marilyn Calhoun, who owns the property surrounding the current quarry bridge on 245th Street, was joined by her sons Dale and Dave, and insisted that she supported the goal of replacing the bridge. "We never, ever said no to a new bridge," said Marilyn Calhoun. "Every one of us agreed, we need a new bridge."

But she and her sons did indicate that they would not accept an agreement unless certain conditions were met to their satisfaction.

Three in particular that they discussed were the placement of a cattle crossing under the bridge, the new path of the road and its distance from a building used by Dave Calhoun, and the price the county offered for the land.

The cattle crossing appeared to be the most contentious. Belzer had offered to add a four-foot wide raised crossing, which Dale Calhoun dismissed as "absolutely worthless."

Marilyn Calhoun said she would prefer a wider crossing closer to the ground. "Any of you that know about cattle, that's not a very wide crossing, and it's way up in the air," she said of Belzer's proposal. "So that's what I said no to."

Based on that response, Belzer said he has withdrawn the offer.

There is currently no crossing under the bridge; one did exist historically, but was washed away by the river and never replaced. Belzer said a new crossing would need to be elevated in order to prevent its being washed away as well, and the amount of foundation material that would be required dictated the four-foot maximum width.

For more, see our Feb. 3 print edition.


©Golden Triangle Media.com 2009


email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendlyTop
Sections
- Homepage
- Obituaries
- Community
- Consumer Guide
- Personal Finance
- For Seniors
- Entertainment
- Classifieds
Online Features
- Calendar
- Guestbook
- Online Photo Gallery
- Lifestyles
- E-Edition
- Links
- Display Ads
- Special Sections
Services
- About Us
- Advertise on Our Site
- Contact Us
- E-mail Updates
- Online Forms
- Subscriber Services
RSS RSS Feeds - RSS is a format set up for sharing content on the Web. The following sections are available as RSS feeds:
- Washington Evening Journal
- Fairfield Daily Ledger
- Mount Pleasant News
Copyright © 2009 Golden Triangle Newspapers Send feedback to pub@washjrnl.com.
All rights reserved. View the Golden Triangle Newspapers's Privacy Policy . This material may not be broadcast, published, rewritten or redistributed without written permission.
Powered by TownNews.com