Clear 34°5 Day Forecast
News Search

Advanced search
go
Home
Shop Now!
Classifieds
Jobs
Auto
Real Estate
Shopping
Place An Ad
News
Sports
Life
Opinion
EditorialsColumnists
Classifieds
Las Noticias
Photo Galleries
People & Events
About Us
Other Publications
Entertainment
Doorways
Subscriptions
Fun and Games
Consumer Guide
Personal Finance
Lifestyles
USA Weekend
Special Section
Entertainment
Movies
TV
Crosswords
Horoscope
Fun & Games
Site Tools
Yellow Pages
Photo Galleries
Services
Subscribe
Photo Reprints
About Us
Daily Freeman Jobs
Home : News : Opinion : Editorials
Editorials
Spitzer's hypocrisy
03/12/2008
email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendly
And, on Day 435, it was all over.


Gov. Eliot Spitzer, who repeatedly had pronounced that everything would change "on Day One" with his inauguration on Jan. 1, 2007, has fallen. And he's not getting up again.


The short of it is that he got caught on federal wiretaps with his pants down, arranging complex trysts at the tony Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C., with astoundingly high-priced New York City hookers.


But the revelations that he engaged the services of prostitutes ain't the half of it.


The investigation that revealed Spitzer's apparent involvement reportedly began with a federal tax inquiry into suspicious financial transactions. As reported by The New York Times, a bank had reported Spitzer's transactions to the Internal Revenue Service. The IRS concluded the governor was trying to hide the movement of money by funneling the money through the bank accounts of phony companies he had created.


That is to say, he was laundering his own cash, which presumably also belongs to his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer.

The money from those phony accounts was then wired into other shell companies controlled by the alleged prostitution ring, the principals of which have been arrested and charged with federal crimes related to the sex trade.


Mind you, Spitzer is not just a well-heeled john - charged with no crime, but of public interest for mere gawking value. Nor is he "just" a governor implicated in a scandal as a client known to be sometimes difficult with prostitute and sometimes to request dangerous. He is quite decidedly the self-righteous crusader against not just illegality, but against "wrong" more generally and, most importantly, quite personally defined by him.


From his crusades against Wall Street traders and tycoon as attorney general to his conduct of the governorship, Spitzer has crafted both his career and political persona on a reputation for rigorously pursuing the right thing on behalf of the public and entertaining no quibbling over circumstances or parsing of statutory language.


As attorney general of the state of New York, Spitzer prosecuted prostitution rings brought down with the state's organized crime task force. As the Times recounted, Spitzer in 2004 "spoke with revulsion and anger" in announcing the arrest of 16 people allegedly connected to a high-end prostitution ring on Staten Island. "This was a sophisticated and lucrative operation with a multitiered management structure," he said. "It was, however, nothing more than a prostitution ring."


Spitzer's wife is reported to be among a minority of advisers who on Monday urged her husband not to resign. With all due respect to Mrs. Spitzer, her husband's relationship to prostitution is as distinctly a public matter for the Empire State as it is a private matter between her and her husband.

What she does with her marriage is her business. But what Eliot Spitzer does with the governorship is very much the people's business.


Neither forbearance on her part nor even her absolution of her husband for these transgressions is material to the public matter at hand.


The hypocrisy of Eliot Spitzer's life, as now revealed, is insufferable. The conflict between his public career and his private conduct are irreconcilable.


He must immediately resign.



©Daily Freeman 2009

Reader Comments
 Submit your own comment!
Added: Wednesday March 12, 2008 at 07:18 AM EST
No Consistency Evident
The mores of soceity with respect to politicians and sex scandals does not appear to have any consistency to it. Case in point: Bill Clinton.
Clinton of course was defended up, down, high, and low on the basis of "it's only his private life", which at the time, was far from the truth. Cries of "We can't reverse the results of an election" went far and near, while such are absent now. The case of Spitzer can much more easily be argued such, as he is not accused of a pattern of sexual harrassment against women as Clinton was as President.
Those who argued strenuously that Clinton had to go argued that such a pattern and practice was so antithetical to the laws that he himself publicly defended, the hypocrisy of such was quite evident, but moreover an attitude which placed women who worked for him in government absent legal intervention at continual risk, which the Lewinsky affair demonstrated to be the case. There is not the kind of suggestion of something similar with Spitzer.
One has to wonder what political loyalty is all about also, as many Democrats have called for the Governor's head, while hardly any at the time called for the head of then-President Clinton, and in fact, undoubtedly saved then-President Clinton's remaining time in office by preventing an Impeachment Conviction.
Jeff Kelly, Kingston, NY

email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendlyTop
Advertisement

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement. Please read our Privacy Policy
©2007 Daily Freeman - a Journal Register Property. All Rights reserved.

Interested in a career with Journal Register Company? Click here.
Journal Register

MidHudsonCentral.com is your local connection to newspaper websites in the Mid-Hudson Region.