• Home
  • News
    • Local News
  • Sports
    • Professional
    • Local
  • Business
    • Opinion
    • Blogs
    • Life
      • Family
      • Entertainment
      • Fun & Games
    • Marketplace
      • Jobs
      • Real Estate
      • Rentals
      • Cars
      • Shopping
      • Special Sections
      • Classifieds
      • Place An Ad
    AllAroundPhilly.com
    Home : News : News : Frontpage
    All Around Philly Network
    AllAroundPhilly.com
    DailyLocal.com
    DelcoTimes.com
    PhoenixvilleNews.com
    PottsMerc.com
    TheReporterOnline.com
    TimesHerald.com
    Trentonian.com
    AllAroundPhillyGolf.com
    AllAroundPhillyHomes.com
    All Publications
    Snow showers 30°5 Day Forecast
    Jobs
    Real Estate
    Rentals
    Autos
    Shopping
    Special Sections
    Classifieds
    Place An Ad
    SERVICES
    ePaper Login
    Subscribe
    Photo Reprints
    RSS Feeds
    Rate Card
    MEMORIES
    Obituaries
    Announcements
    Submit Announcement
    Home : News : News : Frontpage
    Residents react to Pluto decision
    ADAM CIRUCCI, Staff Writer
    08/26/2006
    email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendly
    Pluto is a planet no more.

    But the recent demotion of the ninth rock from the sun was the furthest thing from the minds of county residents, many of whom were focused on enjoying one last summer weekend before September.

    After all, it is almost 4 billion miles away, noted West Chester resident and local stargazer, John Ziminski.

    "Scientists have better things to do with their time. To me, it is pointless. There are multiple extra-solar objects out there -- at least 20 that we know of. Now, it’s just cut it at eight (planets) and stick to it," he said.

    Pluto, long considered a cold, distant,cosmic underdog, was unceremoniously stripped of its status as a planet this weekby the International Astronomical Union (IAU).

    "Pluto has always been kind of the odd man out because it is so different. And we know that is probably because it formed differently," said Karen Vanlandingham, assistant professor of astronomy and director of the planetarium atWest Chester University.

    The IAU, an organization of about 2,500 total members dramatically reversed course Thursday just a week after floating the idea of reaffirming Pluto’s planethood and adding three new planets to Earth’s neighborhood.

    "The definition of the solar system was going to change. Either it was going to be 8 planets or more like 12," Vanlandingham, said.

    Pluto, a planet since 1930, got the boot because it didn’t meet the new rules, which say a planet not only must orbit the sun and be large enough to assume a nearly round shape, but must "clear the neighborhood around its orbit."

    That disqualifies Pluto, which crosses Neptune’s orbit, violating the third guideline, astronomers said.

    Powerful new telescopes, experts said, are changing the way they size up the mysteries of the solar system and beyond. But the scientists at the conference showed a soft side, waving plush toys of the Walt Disney character Pluto the dog -- and insisting that Pluto’s spirit will live on in the exciting discoveries yet to come.

    Not everybody, however, has been pleased with the decision.

    "There has been some controversy. Most astronomers don’t care either way, but there are people who are passing petitions and want to appeal the decision," Vanlandingham said.

    She also estimated that only about 350 of the IAU’s members were present at the Prague meeting.

    And they only make up a fraction of those on Earth.

    According to Vanlandingham, there are some 10,000 astronomers worldwide.

    "The word ‘planet’ and the idea of planets can be emotional because they’re something we learn as children," said Richard Binzel, a professor of planetary science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who helped hammer out the new definition.

    "This is really all about science, which is all about getting new facts," he said. "Science has marched on. ... Many more Plutos wait to be discovered."

    Astronomers have labored without a universal definition of a planet since well before the time of Copernicus, who proved that the Earth revolves around the sun, and the experts gathered in Prague burst into applause when the guidelines were passed.

    Predictably, Pluto’s demotion provoked some wistful nostalgia.

    "It’s disappointing in a way, and confusing," said Patricia Tombaugh, the 93-year-old widow of Pluto discoverer Clyde Tombaugh.

    "I don’t know just how you handle it. It kind of sounds like I just lost my job," she said from Las Cruces, N.M. "But I understand science is not something that just sits there. It goes on. Clyde finally said before he died, ‘It’s there. Whatever it is. It is there.’"

    The decision by the IAU, the official arbiter of heavenly objects, restricts membership in the elite cosmic club to the eight classical planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.

    Pluto and objects like it will be known as "dwarf planets," which raised some thorny questions about semantics: If a raincoat is still a coat, and a cell phone is still a phone, why isn’t a dwarf planet still a planet?

    NASA said Pluto’s downgrade would not affect its $700 million New Horizons spacecraft mission, which this year began a 9½-year journey to the oddball object to unearth more of its secrets.

    But mission head Alan Stern said he was "embarrassed" by Pluto’s undoing and predicted that Thursday’s vote would not end the debate. Although 2,500 astronomers from 75 nations attended the conference, only about 300 showed up to vote.

    "It’s a sloppy definition. It’s bad science," he said. "It ain’t over."

    Under the new rules, two of the three objects that came tantalizingly close to planethood will join Pluto as dwarfs: The asteroid Ceres, which was a planet in the 1800s before it got demoted, and 2003 UB313, an icy object slightly larger than Pluto whose discoverer, Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology, has nicknamed "Xena."

    The third object, Pluto’s largest moon, Charon, isn’t in line for any special designation.

    Brown, whose Xena find rekindled calls for Pluto’s demise because it showed it isn’t nearly as unique as it once seemed, waxed philosophical.

    "Eight is enough," he said, jokingly adding: "I may go down in history as the guy who killed Pluto."

    The Associated Press contributed to this article.

    To contact staff writer Adam Cirucci, send an e-mail to acirucci@dailylocal.com.


    ©Daily Local News 2010

    Submit your comment now
    Comment Title:
    Submit your comments on the article in the space below:
    Your Name:
    Your City & State:  
    Your Email Address: (required)
    What's This?
    In order to verify you are not a spam-bot you will need to use the image above.
    The addition of the flashing numbers above =
    By submitting your comment, you acknowledge that you have read and accept the Terms and Conditions of this site.
    Reader Comments
    Added: Monday August 28, 2006 at 04:12 PM EST
    Pluto
    As a volunteer planetarium coordinator, I have used Pluto and its odd characteristics to help my students discuss what the diferences are between planets and stars and comets and asteroids and moons. Most of my students over the last 10 years have questioned Pluto as a "planet". With the introduction of UB313 (Xena), some of my fifth graders last year suggested "dwarf planet". I guess the astronmers are just catching up to our kids.
    Kathy, Malvern PA
    Added: Sunday August 27, 2006 at 09:11 PM EST
    Pluto will always be a planet
    When I was younger, strung out, and messed up, I saw a twinkle of hope. It was... ...Pluto, little cold, an outcast from the rest. It made me think that if I tried hard enough, I too could be a planet in my own microcosm. I am better now, more successful with a rich fulfilling life. I know that in time that everyone, from Muslim to Hebrew, Black to White, and Diesel to Unleaded, can all get along if they would just look to the tiny Pluto for inspiration and guidance> As the 2 Skinny J's said, "Pluto, is a planet!!!!". Godd luck and may Pluto shine upon you
    CM, Saginaw, South Carolina
    Added: Sunday August 27, 2006 at 10:04 AM EST
    Who cares what pluto is called.
    who cares if scientists decided that Pluto is not a planet. That does not have real impact on anybodies life. Sentimental attachments to a planet are ridiculous and so are petitions to reverse de decision. There are too many other important issues in the world to worry about something so trivial.
    Mercedes Garcia, Hamilton, Ontario
    Added: Sunday August 27, 2006 at 08:18 AM EST
    Misplaced question
    It was scientists that allowed 9 planets to begin with, so they have every right to change it. The real question people should be asking is, if you are going to demote Pluto, why does Neptune (which shares an orbit with Pluto) get to remain a planet? That is the double-standard here.
    The Definer
    Added: Sunday August 27, 2006 at 07:58 AM EST
    Copernicus and "proof"
    Copernicus didn't "prove" the planets orbit the sun. He is regarded as having founded the theory, but there was no proof. If there were proof, then long after when Gallileo reported his findings, they would have been insignificant. . .
    kevin, Lincoln Nebraska
    Added: Sunday August 27, 2006 at 05:45 AM EST
    What's the hype?
    It seems clear that the solar system doesn't have nine planets. If there's eight, eleven, twelve, or whatever other number you like, depends on what you call a planet. But the only reason for the nine we learned at school is that they were detected first. Which doesn't sound like a good definition that could resist the test of time. Why not go back to the planets the Greeks knew? That would at have the advantage that they are visible to the naked eye...

    I don't see why people are getting so upset.... Doesn't a rose have a delightful smell, no matter by what name you call it?
    Rudolf, Germany
    Added: Sunday August 27, 2006 at 02:04 AM EST
    Pluto is still unique... Just not a planet
    Defining just 8 planets makes sure that the planets are part of a special group... Pluto will always thought of as the "9th Planet", but defining just 8 planets gives them a special place.

    If Pluto was allowed to stay a planet, then many others (possibly dozens) would need to be considered and possibly let in... How special would a planet be then?

    This makes pluto even more special, as it now used to be a true planet, and was the special (now non-existant) "9th Planet", instead of just one of dozens!
    Mark, Thursday Island, Queensland, Australia
    Added: Sunday August 27, 2006 at 01:37 AM EST
    Pluto is bigger than all astronomers
    As a previous poster said, you just can't change the definition of a planet. The concept of planets is not under the control of astronomers. It's like arborists deciding that a fir tree isn't a tree anymore, but a super tree. Preposterous. A bunch of silly self-important people trying to draw the limelight to their often overlooked profession. I, for one, will continue to consider Pluto a planet no matter what they say.
    Rebecca, Albuquerque, NM
    Added: Sunday August 27, 2006 at 12:31 AM EST
    Residents react to Pluto decision
    According to the new defintions, the Earth and Jupiter don't qualify to be planets either. Earth has some 10,000 near earth asteroids, and Jupiter has 100,000 trojan asteriods. Niether Jupiter or Earth has clean out it's orbit. It is sloppy science at best. Having known Clyde Tombaugh and how he felt about demoting his discovery, I will always disagree with demoting this planet. Only 4% of the IAU was there to vote on this definition. Is that the way we want science run?? Tar and feather them!

    --AL
    AL, Warsaw, IN. 46580
    Added: Sunday August 27, 2006 at 11:07 PM EST
    Spelling and Grammar
    I am ashamed to share this planet with many of the previous people who commented. I'm not event sure what they were trying to say. However, Pluto may not be a planet but it is still an astronomical body. There are many objects that orbit the sun (technically, everything in the Solar System orbits the sun) and they cannot all be planets lest we end up trying to teach people the 600 planets.
    Adam, Portland, OR
    View All 14 Comments »

    email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendlyTop
    CONTACT US  •  OUR PUBLICATIONS  •  PRIVACY POLICY  •  NEWSPAPERS IN EDUCATION
    © 2008 Daily Local News — a Journal Register Property. All Rights Reserved.