Reservation shopping has sparked opposition in Congress. The federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 allows tribes to operate casinos on their own reservations. Such casinos can help to overcome poverty and the lack of other economic opportunities on Indian reservations.
But the push for tribal casinos outside of reservations is another matter. Some tribes with casinos on their reservations fear that off-reservation casinos could lead to states fighting to impose taxes on all types of Indian casinos.
One longtime casino gambling opponent, Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Virginia, has asked President Bush to impose a two-year moratorium on the opening of any off-reservation tribal casinos to provide time for reviewing the issue. Rep. Richard Pombo, R-California, plans to introduce a bill that would ban off-reservation casinos entirely.
The Eastern Shawnee tribe of Oklahoma is proposing a $100 million casino resort complex in Lorain. The Eastern Shawnee also want to build casinos elsewhere in Ohio. We don't view the Eastern Shawnee plan as reservation shopping because Lorain Mayor Craig Foltin invited the tribe here to boost Lorain's economic future.
The Eastern Shawnee and Mayor Foltin have our appreciation for thinking outside of the box and trying to get an Indian casino built in Lorain. The tribe's casino-resort plan appears well-intentioned, desirable and able to bring new life to Lorain's lakefront.
Still, despite the potential local effect of a federal ban or moratorium on off-reservation casinos, Congress would be wise to review the overall issue of reservation shopping in the United States.
Examine how it relates to the intent of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and provide protection against tribes and towns being abused by greedy investors.