Yellow Pages
Student opposition to civil unions disrupts SWHS
By Candace Taylor, Journal Inquirer 04/16/2005
SOUTH WINDSOR -- Four high school students were sent home Friday after they wore T-shirts bearing anti-homosexual slogans to school, causing a series of disturbances as other students became "emotionally distraught," students and school officials said.
The boys, who wore white T-shirts on which they had written, "Adam and Eve, Not Adam and Steve," say their constitutional right to free speech has been violated. "We were just voicing our opinions," said Steven Vendetta, who made the T-shirts with his friends, Kyle Shinfield, David Grimaldi, and another student who asked not to be identified. "We didn't tell other people to think what we're thinking. We just told them what we think." But other students say they felt threatened by the shirts, which also quoted Bible verses pertaining to homosexuality. "I didn't feel safe at this school today," said Diana Rosen, who is co-president of the school's Gay-Straight Alliance. Vendetta said the impetus for the T-shirts came earlier in the week, when students at the high school took part in the annual Day of Silence, a project orchestrated by the national Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network. On the Day of Silence, students across the country do not speak, as a reminder of the discrimination and harassment experienced by homosexuals. Students at the high school also wore signs showing their support for legislation that would recognize civil unions for same-sex couples in Connecticut, Vendetta said. Vendetta and his friends, who oppose civil unions, wanted to make their feelings known. "We felt if they could voice their opinions for it, we could voice our opinion against it," he said. "There is another side to this debate, and we're representing it." Almost immediately, the shirts drew comment and debate from other students, Vendetta said. "I walked down the hall, and people were either cheering me on, yelling at me, or just sneering," he said. "It was the most intense experience." Teachers brought the situation to the attention of high school Principal John DiIorio, who said Friday that the law protects students' freedom of speech, as long as that speech doesn't disrupt the educational process. He told the boys they could continue to wear the shirts as long as they didn't become a distraction to others. The students returned to class. But heated arguments and altercations ensued almost immediately, with some students becoming "very emotional," said student Sam Etter. Rosen said that when she first saw the shirts, she "almost didn't believe it." She became very upset, crying and spending most of the day in administrators' and guidance counselor's offices. She also got into several arguments, she said. "I saw a large crowd gathered during one of our lunch waves," said senior William "B.J." Haun. "A large debate was going on. It involved a lot of people. By the end of the day, everyone was talking about it and giving their two cents." Eventually, DiIorio called the boys into the office and told them that other students were becoming "emotionally distraught," Shinfield said. He then asked the boys to remove the shirts. They refused and were sent home. DiIorio said no disciplinary action has been taken against them. Shinfield, who says he believes "the choice to become homosexual is against the will of God," says he doesn't regret what he did. "If we took the shirts off, it ruined the whole point of wearing them," he said. "I wouldn't have been able to deal with my conscience. This topic is really important to me." But he added that he didn't intend to hurt other students' feelings. "It upset me that people took it personally," he said. Alex Goldberg, a member of the Gay-Straight Alliance, said his classmates have a right to their opinions but took it too far. "School is supposed to be a safe zone for everyone," he said. "It's crossing the line when you target other people."
©Journal Inquirer 2009
Added: Sunday May 08, 2005 at 06:11 PM EST I disagree with the sentiment the boys t-shirts expressed, but I do believe they have the right to free speech.
However, one thing to consider is this: the students who support gay rights are not asking anyone to change their lives, or the choices they make. They are not discriminating against heterosexuals by promoting gay rights. There is not a finite amount of equality, that when it's used up, everyone else is left out in the cold.
However, the sentiments expressed on the boys t-shirts are encourating a point of view that does not allow for the "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" for people who are homosexual. They want to discriminate against others, and create a class of people who are not given equal treatment under the law, which is unconstitutional.
If you believe that gay marriage hurts heterosexual marriage, that's really your problem. Maureen Barton Added: Monday April 25, 2005 at 07:40 PM EST When will the right to free speech be up help for Christians? The public school system and the government are a joke when it come to issues such as this. Tolerance! Tolerance! you cry, until the stinging truth is revealed that you are justifying bad behavior and poor judgment. Roman 1:27-30 says " 27-And the men also turned from natural relations with women and were set ablaze (burning out, consumed) with lust for one another--men committing shameful acts with men and suffering in their own [a]bodies and personalities the inevitable consequences and penalty of their wrong-doing and going astray, which was [their] fitting retribution. 28-And so, since they did not see fit to acknowledge God or approve of Him or consider Him worth the knowing, God gave them over to a base and condemned mind to do things not proper or decent but loathsome, 29-Until they were filled (permeated and saturated) with every kind of unrighteousness, iniquity, grasping and covetous greed, and malice. [They were] full of envy and jealousy, murder, strife, deceit and treachery, ill will and cruel ways. [They were] secret backbiters and gossipers, 30-Slanderers, hateful to and hating God, full of insolence, arrogance, [and] boasting; inventors of new forms of evil, disobedient and undutiful to parents."
It sounds like the state the world is in doesn't. Wake up folks. Make no mistake, Jesus Christ is coming back soon. Pete Lappin Added: Monday April 25, 2005 at 01:01 AM EST To do or say something morally wrong (as written in the Bible) is somewhat acceptable nowadays in our schools. But to do or say something against morally-wrong acts receives indifference by almost everyone. Schools are supposed to be an institution that upholds moral conduct, and we all know that homosexuality is morally wrong. I'm impressed by what what these 4 students were doing. They did what the teachers should be doing. Harold Soriano Added: Saturday April 23, 2005 at 05:59 AM EST Well Matt, if I were to use your perspective, then you just ran through the halls yelling "I think soup is best served with crackers!" In other words your opinion is irrelevant. That couldn't be true though because I am responding to it, making it relevant. All of our opinions matter and to simply discount them because they aren't in line with mine our yours is sophomoric.
We should be promoting dialogue, discussion about the varying opinions. What the school did is validate the position of one side of a disagreement by penalizing the opposition. That is not within the purview of the school. There are proper ways to deal with dissention and it isn't to support either side of an issue in a public school paid for by taxpayer dollars.
There are parents out there that pay taxes for education and we have responsibility to contribute to the entire growth process of our children. The school overstepped its authority in depriving these four students a day in school for the disruptive actions of a vocal minority.
I live in a world where abhorrent conduct is all around me, corrupt government officials, pedophilia, contraceptive abortions, corrupt corporations, and so much more. I have the right and obligation to attempt to eliminate those atrocities, and better to do this with words and dialogue than to resort to less desirable but far more attention grabbing physical means, wouldn't you say? To say that conversation, discussion, peaceful objection isn't respected, relevant, or worthy of consideration only serves to turn attention to means that are all of the above but definately are not what we would desire. G W Added: Friday April 22, 2005 at 05:39 PM EST Good for those four students who displayed, on T-shirts, that they and God / The Bible do not approve of homosexuality. It seems that freedom of speech does not apply to those who are conservative and concerned about being pleasing to God.
Shame on the politically correct and spineless principal who sent the four students home because of a few "distraught" students. I wonder if those displaying pro homosexual messages would have been treated the same way. I tend to think not.
Derek H. Franklin Minister - Crawford Road Church of Christ Rock Hill, SC Derek Franklin Added: Friday April 22, 2005 at 02:55 PM EST When my son asked me if he could wear such a shirt to school I had no problem with it. As long as there was nothing derogatory about it, this, in my opinion wasn’t. My son is not anti-gay by any means. He is against same sex marriages, as is his faith. He is getting confirmed this year and believes in the Catholic Church wholeheartedly. I on the other hand, a practicing Catholic too, do not agree with the church on this stance, but certainly respect the Church and my son’s opinion. My son is the kindest young gentleman you’d ever meet and would never harm anyone. We have several gay friends and love and treat them as much as all our friends. Tom Vendetta Added: Friday April 22, 2005 at 12:47 PM EST I would also like to voice my opinion. I will admit I, too, am against any union other than marriage between a woman and man. It is morally wrong to have any other union! The students at SWHS knew what they were doing and they knew what kind of attention they were going to be getting. (That would be my point in doing it). I am proud that they had the courage to stand up for what was right and not what was popular. That is not an easy thing for a teenager to do in this day and age. It takes character to go against the crowd. I must say I am ashamed that people would be so offended by people taking advantage of their first amendment right to freedom of expression in the form they saw fit. As was stated, these young men did not belittle, insult or hurt anyone else who did or did not agree with them. One would hope that in America people would learn to be more tolerant of others and their views. I myself, along with many others around the country will be taking part in an anit-civil union or marriage silent rally on Monday with white T-shirts. I hope I will be treated with more respect and not cause anyone "emotional distress." But one can only hope and pray. Sar Na Added: Friday April 22, 2005 at 11:07 AM EST This is a shame. The students should not have been sent home or asked to remove their shirts. Although I do not agree with their views, it's important that students should be able to express their beliefs freely.
I grew up in South Windsor (I'm living in Oregon now) and I attended SWHS in the late 1970's. Back then, anti-gay harrassment was the accepted norm. I'm pleased to see that that has changed, but I am disturbed that the school feels that gay rights must come at the expense of free speech.
I find it pretty difficult to sympathize with the student who spent the day crying in the administrators' offices. All because of a T-shirt that said "Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve"? Give me a break. Kid, you don't know how good you've got it.
The administration of SWHS did not advance the cause of gay equality; on the contrary, they set it back, by discouraging open debate, and by creating the perception that gay activists want to advance their own rights at the expense of others'. This hurts everyone. Asher Abrams Added: Thursday April 21, 2005 at 03:57 PM EST There is no doubt a great distraction in the school day occurred. However, if one side can voice their opinions and somehow have a national observance of silence during the school day to make their point, these boys can wear their shirts. That being said, I'm sure these days their is school policy concerning what can be worn by the students. In making any point, we should be sure not to break the rules. They are there for a reason; most importantly, the safety of all children! Wayne in Florida Wayne Rodgers Added: Thursday April 21, 2005 at 12:04 AM EST I think taking the issue seriously was the problem in the first place. I believe in asking someone's opinion if I think I need it. If you are just voicing an opinion, it is like running through the halls yelling 'I think soup is best served with crackers!.' The kids knew it was going to attract attention, cause disruption. Thats what some kids like to do. Making a big deal about it only gives them what they want. The only attention valuable enough to give them would be the the psychological kind. I'm just voicing my opinion. <--- Matt ? Added: Wednesday April 20, 2005 at 11:15 AM EST Another students account of the day at SWHS is posted at MorallyStraightAlliance.org R P Added: Tuesday April 19, 2005 at 02:54 PM EST I think we're getting bogged down on the hot-button issue and failing to see the big picture. The schools are supposed to be preparing young people to function responsibly in the real world. In the real world, we are surrounded by people whose opinions differ from our own -- yet we must get along with these people.
I don't care what the issue is or which side of it students are on -- if they behave badly, if they cannot show self-control and respect for others, the school needs to address that lack of civilized behavior.
These students are young adults. They want to be taken seriously as young adults. Yet they are absolutely crumbling because someone HURT THEIR FEELINGS by having the temerity to disagree with them. Get a grip! Administrators and parents who cater to this infantile, narcissistic behavior are not operating in the students' best interests. They are not preparing them for success in the future. Crybabies who become dysfunctional from simply reading a T-shirt opinion that offends them are seriously in need of help. If you really care about these students, for heaven's sake, don't reward their emotional terrorism ("Accede to my demands or I'll pitch a huge fit and disrupt school!"). This does them no favor.
When they get out of the coddled, protected school environment where they can spend the day crying in an administrator's office, how will they function? They can emote all over the place, but are they developing any coping skills for dealing realistically with a clash of opinion in the real world?
In the real world, someone will likely take a poke at a person who behaves this way -- not because they are pro-gay, but because they are obnoxious. (I'm not advocating this, just stating a fact.) To throw fits and demand that everyone else's desires and sensibilities bow to your own is simply obnoxious. While painting themselves as the victims, they are in reality the bullies, the aggressors.
We are turning out a generation of wimps who are slaves to their own self-centered feelings and think those passionate feelings are legitimate arbiters and guardians of morality.
Lynda Friesen Added: Tuesday April 19, 2005 at 11:53 AM EST Sadly, this story illustrates that the public school system is nothing but a cesspool for leftist indoctrination. It was well said that the troublemakers (HETEROPHOBES and THEOPHOBES) throwing temper tantrums because people do not agree with them were rewareded. Their hissy fits are rewarded and those willing to stand up for their beliefs are punished.
How much longer before Christians in America are violently attacked in the streets and it is acceptable to the bureaucrats? That day is fast approaching and the church is frighteningly silent.
Apparently it's acceptable to be attacked in America for your religious and moral beliefs. We have a completely, totally, and absolutely perverted form of government where right is wrong and wrong is right. Where evil is good and good is evil. We live in a deranged culture and unless more people stand against this onslaught of perversity, it's only going to get worse! Bill W Added: Tuesday April 19, 2005 at 11:35 AM EST The last thing that the homosexual lobby is interested in is "tolerance." What it actually wants is coerced acceptance. This is classical statism, and it has no place in this country. Hence, the more this agenda is pushed, the more resistance it will encounter, please God. Frank Hannon Added: Tuesday April 19, 2005 at 01:47 AM EST According to the article, the kids who were disruptive were not the ones wearing the T-shirts, but those who objected to the message. The administration should have disciplined the students who created the disruptions for failing to respect the opinions (and "feelings"?) of others. Instead, the message these kids were given is if they throw a big enough fit, others must give in. How does catering to their immature and self-centered demands prepare them for the real world?
Why are those disruptive students permitted to force their morality on everyone else?
Teach the kids that we all must act reasonably and not be ruled by our emotions. They need to learn self-control, respect for others, and not to throw temper tantrums when they encounter someone whose beliefs differ from theirs. Isn't that what DIVERSITY is all about? Elisabeth Taylor Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 09:49 PM EST The pro-homosexual agenda marches up and down every main street in the United States screaming "tolerance" louder than a retarded howler monkey. But when anyone has the nerve to disagree with the gay lifestyle, they brand you a homophobic, accuse you of hate crimes and sic the ACLU on you. Is this tolerance?
Apparently, their definition of "tolerance" is: Agree with everything we say or do, or we'll ruin you.
I believe we've seen that definition played out in the story we just read. It's sad to see, but I believe that as homosexual recruitment drives in America's school become more and more prevalent, the gay agenda will go to extreme measures to squelch anything and everything that might be seen as a dissenting opinion.
This is not tolerance. I am not gay; personally I find the homosexual lifestyle to be repugnant. That does not mean I spend my nights waiting outside a gay bar with a baseball bat in one hand and a bible in the other. I TOLERATE the gay lifestyle, and I would expect that gays would tolerate my dissenting opinion in turn. However, with stories like these read almost daily in newspapers around the nation, I have come to the conclusion that the homosexual agenda lacks the maturity and civility needed to be taken seriously by modern society so they make up for that lack by legally forcing governments and schools to enforce their viewpoints.
I guess tolerance is a one-way street after all.
Luke Meter Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 08:23 PM EST It seems to me that the students for the gay rights should learn not to be so weak that a shirt with what was on them make them so upset. Just because you cant handle what they say doesnt mean you get to decide how they say it.Maybe the straight students should go to the office whinning next time they see something promoting gays. richard hudson Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 07:50 PM EST This whole "Gay Rights" movement is about privelege and the destruction of America. Sodom and Gomorah - they burned. Not because of their sexual sin but because of the pride they took in it. Homosexuality is the choice of spiritual suicide. God said don't do it. It IS a choice. Apparently the school administration is devoid of morality. God not allowed. Very sad. Michael E. Scott Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 07:10 PM EST MAYBE MY LAST EMAIL WAS A LITTLE HARSH. HOW ABOUT THIS...TRY GETTING A "MANDATORY" DAY OF PRAYER INSTALLED INTO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM FOR PERSECUTED CHRISTIANS. 480 CHRISTIANS AROUND THE WORLD WILL DIE TODAY BECAUSE OF THEIR FAITH. SEEMS FAIR TO ME THAT CHRISTIANS SHOULD HAVE A SPECIAL DAY FOR THEIR PERSECUTED. OH, I FORGOT, SOMEWHERE, SOMEHOW, SOMEONE MISINTERPRETED THE CONSTITUTION AND SAYS THAT THERE IS A SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE. SHOW THAT TO ME IN WRITING PLEASE. AGAIN, TOLERANCE ONLY FOR THOSE WHO AREN'T TOLERABLE. KEITH PATRICK Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 06:51 PM EST The gay community will continue to preach tolerance of their point of view while condemning and being intolerant of any point of view that THEY do not like. Dave Benjamin Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 05:54 PM EST "Alex Goldberg, a member of the Gay-Straight Alliance, said his classmates have a right to their opinions but took it too far."School is supposed to be a safe zone for everyone," he said. 'It's crossing the line when you target other people.'"
You're absolutely correct, Mr. Goldberg. The ONLY thing these kids were guilty of was thinking that they too are allowed an opinion. Bad enough that they were forced to participate in a celebration of something they feel is wrong. Seems to me all the "targeting" was being done TO them, not BY them. Karen Qualls Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 05:14 PM EST Everyone has rights in this country, it is a constitutional ammendment. However, it seems that some particular "groups" have more rights than others when it comes to free speach. Let us leave school as school, teach U.S. history, math, english, reading, writing, economics, poli-sci, science, etc. Social issues based on someones CHOICE have no place in public schools and the only ones who will argue are the ones it "benefits". Look at Hitler, a classic case; Hitler had an unacceptable social view according to most of the worlds "standards". He at first wasn't successful then he changed gears, if you aren't successful forcing your social beliefs onto todays world then try starting with the children. "If you want to change the world tomorrow, start with the children of today." As we can see in state after state, marriage amendments between a man and a women have passed when the vote is put to the people. People don't want to accept homosexuality because simply it is not natural. So to make it "acceptable", we introduce it into our schools starting in Kindergarten and call it "sensitivity training" or something else, it is really a shame. Oh, and please don't bring the civil rights issues of the 1960's into this either, the people who went through that era didn't CHOOSE to be born a certain color, it just happend and they were treated terrbile because of it. It is really no wonder why the U.S. is falling behind the rest of the world in education, we are too busy debating social issuses at school instead of educating our children. I sure am glad I home-school, at least my children will get an education. KEITH PATRICK Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 04:40 PM EST This story proves that those religion is nothing but a hate machine producing more offspring filed with vicious hate. These are the same people who support denying domestic partner health care to a gay spouse. They rather see us die then live free and happy. I used to be a Christian, they have done there best to kill my beliefs. There cannot be a god with nuts like this. Joseph Mills Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 03:48 PM EST To say that 'God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve' is only stating appears in every Bible translation that I know of, as well as what is an account of creation that appears in numerous cultures (too many to count) around the world. The first tow humans were a man and a woman, not a man and a man, a union out of which civilization grew throughout the ages.
Descrimination mave been communicated, but descrimination is not inherently hateful, When I buy a blue shirt instead of a purpleI am only demo;nstrating my free choice to prefer the blue shirt.
Unless accompanied by some physical demonstration of 'hatred' such perceived 'hatred' or intimidation is in the mind and heart of the one reading the shirt.
To prefer man/woman intimate relationships over man/man or woman/woman relationships is merely agreeing with the God of the universe. And, lest we forget, "God IS love" and He does love all of his creation. However, he is also a just and Holy God who hates sin, while loving the sinner.
Just because modern culture and a segment of that culture has an agenda to normalize what is an abomination in the eyes of God, an abomination is an abomination.
In my opinion, the phrase in question is actually kind and thought provoking. Dan Cartwright Cartwright Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 02:57 PM EST I feel that the only rights that were violated where those of the 4 young men wanting to display what they truly feel in their hearts. The young lady, Rosen, who became upset only wanted to attract attention to herself, get a life girl, everyone is entitled to their freedoms, not just the 'gays.' sharron hayward Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 02:09 PM EST Free Speech Issue:
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES On the Constitution: "If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively call for attachment than any other it is the principle of free thought-not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate."
Public School Administrators should be forced to take a course in U.S. Constitution, which is the law of the land.Read the 1st Amendment. The Constitution has not changed, just because the culture has changed.
Waste Watchers Inc P.O.BOX 3535 Fremont, California 94539 Richard Ahern-Vice President www.wastewatchersinc.org
Richard Ahern Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 01:52 PM EST As a journalist and a graudate of SWHS, you will not find a more aggressive defender of the first amendment than me, and while there are cases to be made for the defense of free speech in schools, what the four boys were wearing on their t-shirts is hate speech, pure and simple. "Adam & Eve, Not Adam & Steve" is the cultural and rhetorical equivalent of "It's All Right If It's All White." I also take umbrage with the idea of an anti-heterosexual agenda. When people are fighting for their rights, it is not an agenda, it's the natural human instinct to be free. The homosexual community only has to get aggressive because they've been oppressed so roundly for so long.
It should also be duly noted that the inclusion of a Bible verse on the t-shirts is a signifier of hate speech--blame the Christian right for that. Remember: The Ku Klux Klan are serving Jesus as well. It just goes to show that all of these issues exist in shades of gray, and that any attempt to be definitively right will only end in chaos. However, there is no question about the rights of homosexuals--their rights are not only guaranteed to them as Americans, but as members of the human race as well. Kyle Anderson Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 01:21 PM EST So, school is a safe zone and everyone is entitled to freedom of speech, so long as that speech conforms to the views espoused by the school and the Political Correctness police. I forgot about that caveat in the Constitution. As for Ms. Rosen, if she is so upset by people with opinions that differ from hers, I suggest that she move to the deep desert where she will have no contact with other people lest her feelings be hurt. This is not a question over the moral correctness of homosexuality (I'm an attorney who specializes in representing gay clients)...this is a question of people in power trampling the rights of others to voice their opinions. The First Amendment was not written to protect acceptable speech...speech with which everyone agrees needs no protection. It was written to protect speech that may be unacceptable, harsh or politically incorrect. Some people may agree with stifling the speech of these students on this occasion...just remember, if you agree with these actions you have no right to ask for protection when your ideas are targeted. Doug White Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 12:34 PM EST It seems that if you have an opinion that you are sick of having the Gay Agenda rammed down your throat and express "Pride" in being straight it is "divisive". There is an obvious Gender bias in favor of Gay Students. I am sick of the Gay Activists who are forcing their views on me. I am for civil unions, not for Gay Marriage. This is part of an agenda a war against Heterosexuals.
Randall Shake Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 12:09 PM EST Thank you for covering this story, it is a grave reminder that our country is moving in the wrong direction. If you want to cover an interesting, thought-provoking event, on May 21 at 7:00 p.m. at the Salisbury School in Salisbury, John Rankin will be debating Arline Isaacson, co-chair of the Massachusetts Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus. They have debated twice before, at Boston University and at Harvard.
The 4 South Windsor high school students should not have been sent home. Their shirts were not hateful, they simply expressed their beliefs in a very effective way. Marriage is something God has defined between a man and a woman. The true intolerance going on in this country is rather quickly moving toward the intolerance of the Christian viewpoint. The student's rights have been violated and I'm sure it will be addressed.
What is our country coming to?
The gay agenda is saying that Christians hate them. I am relatively sure that if you asked the 4 students if they would give their own lives for a gay student placed in a dangerous situation... they would. As would I. Jeff Coleman Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 11:57 AM EST This is selective censorship, plain and simple. It proves the sheer hypocrisy of those who claim to stand for "tolerance and diversity". They're only tolerant of those who share their "politically correct" views. Glenn Harris Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 11:39 AM EST The hypocrisy of the school officials and pro-gay students is so blatant, I'm surprised the article didn't address the matter. How is it proper to promote a day to advocate for the 'normalization' of homosexuality, but improper to advocate for traditional values and views on homosexuality?
The intolerance of the school officials and pro-gay students shows a stunning ignorance and bigotry. The students who stood up for the traditional views on homosexuality should be respected for their non-violent approach to stating their views. The school officials and students who were hostile towards them should be forced to attend a class on tolerance. Jeff Adams Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 07:53 AM EST It simply amazes me that students who prefer to engage in sodomy can require "safe" zone and a Day of Silence, yet someone who wants to silently speak out about the matter is told to stop it. How is someone threatened by a tee-shirt? Frankly, the GSA is assaulting the morals of many people. Shouldn't those students feel threatened. And shouldn't schools be examining the issue in an open and honest way? Stop the GSA Storm Troopers from ruining the school!! Lance Roulic Added: Monday April 18, 2005 at 02:31 AM EST Can you pass on Steven Vendetta's e-mail to me - this dude has guts for GOD and he says what is right is RIGTH and what is WRONG in WRONG and what is WRONG is not RIGHT and what is RIGHT is not wrong! William Caery Added: Sunday April 17, 2005 at 10:43 AM EST the principal was way out of bounds the boys didn't do anything wrong. What about all these sexual inuendo shirts and the witchcraft that is more indecant and wrong and those should be the ones questioned and dealt with not a shirt following the bible and deplicting right from wrong. That is there first amendament right!!! Louise Lonsdale Added: Sunday April 17, 2005 at 06:00 AM EST I see a disturing trend here. There appears to be an oppression of free speech happening and again the political correct mentality is rearing its ugly head. You can't oppose civil unions or gay/lesbian relationships without the establishment taking a stand against you? The voice of the advocates for such unions can say whatever they want without similar restriction by the establishment? This story is disturbing. A day of silence...whether you agree or not you are forced to observe this nonsense? Where does it say the freedom of speech is protected "as long as that speech doesn't disrupt the educational process"? I wish people wouldn't make things up. Free speech must remain a protected right or we are facing certain destruction. Locally we have the power to insure that free speech isn't qualified or marginalized. We must object to any attempt by any government agency to oppress free speech. Learning to disagree respectfully is far better than prohibiting dialogue altogether. We cannot permit our schools to interfere in the free exchange of ideas and opinions...or we will all suffer. G W Added: Saturday April 16, 2005 at 10:24 PM EST As a student at South Windsor High School, and a member of the Human Relations Commitee (Group dedicated to working for the tolerance of different peoples at our school), it makes me absolutely sick to think that a group of innocent people could be assulted in such a way, with absolutely no consequesnces for the perpetrators. Had this protest been held outside of the school, in a neutral setting, it would have been perfectly acceptable. But by bringing those shirts into a place that is supposed to promote respect and care, those students simply crossed the line. They should certainly be made to bear the consequences for ther actions against the Gay community of South Windsor High, and those of us who look to the school as a haven from the pressures of society. Joseph Kessler Added: Saturday April 16, 2005 at 11:33 AM EST I agree with Dianna Rosen and Alex Goldberg. I think they had valid points of view and I think that even though the boys wearing the shirts had the right to freedom of speech they didn't have the right to discrimination. The Day of Silence, signs wore by students, were to ask people to accept us and treat us fairly. Although the t-shirts made by these boys were derogatory and offensive to many students at SWHS. I appreciate that the students were voicing their opinions but they could have done it in a more apropriate manner. The events of the day were very stressful on myself and friends of mine and I hope that if we have the Day of Silence in the future we can resolve any conflicts better than we have. Jackie Lipson
|
|
|