Home : News : News : Top Stories
City decides against fluoridation of water
By DAVID OWENS, Staff Writer
10/28/2004
email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendly
After months of heated debate, Clarksdale leaders decided not to fluoridate the city's water supply. Led by Ward 3 Commissioner Buster Moton, the mayor and his board voted unanimously to strike down the motion.


"It seemed like the board was dragging along something," Moton said. "It didn't really need to be dragged along. To put fluoride in the water is unneccesary."
Moton said he decided he should do something after seeing resident response.
"It seemed like we ought not to entertain that," he said. "We have other big, major problems more so than debating fluoride in the water. We should have that out in the beginning."
On Sept. 27, Fluoridation Administrator John Daniel Justice of the Mississippi Department of Health presented his case for fluoridation.
In facts he presented, Justice said 70.5 percent of third graders experienced tooth decay and 15 percent have an urgent need for dental care. He said 35.1 percent of persons 65 or older have lost all their natural teeth.
Over one million Mississippians receive fluoridated water, but only 42 percent in public water systems, he said. In comparison, over 90 percent of Tennesseans and Georgians receive some type of fluoridated water.
After hearing Justice speak, the board agreed to postpone any decision until Monday's meeting.
At that meeting, Rudolph Massey presented his case against fluoridation.
"Fluoride is a poison," he said. "They would be medicating people against their will through the public water supply. That's unconstitutional."
"If they can put fluoride in the water, they can take anything they want and put it in there," he said. "Do you want to drink aspirin or antibiotics?"
It is well agreed that fluoride is useful in a topical solution, like in toothpaste. However, Massey argues that even that can be harmful.
"The tube of toothpaste says not to use too much when brushing your teeth, especially swallowing it," he said. "That is especially true with young children."
The measure has a history of failure. For the past 26 years, the city has tried to fluoridate the water through a referendum of the people.
"Each time it failed miserably," Massey said. "It was like a snake. You can stomp a snake in the head and think it's dead, but it just keeps on reviving. I think the board did the right thing in all respects."
In other news:
n Randy Scrivner from Watkins, Ward and Stafford presented the city's audit. The audit noted no problems and a balance of $750,000 as of September 30.
n Mayor Henry Espy announced twenty miles of streets will be paved within thirty days. It will be a three million dollar project with no additional taxes on taxpayers.
n Ralph Simpson presented a grievance on behalf of two city hall employees of surveillance cameras in their office. Simpson said the cameras were hidden and were discriminatory.


©Clarksdale Press Register 2010

Reader Comments
 Submit your own comment!
Added: Wednesday November 10, 2004 at 10:51 AM EST
More Tooth Decay in Poor Children; Fluoridation No Help

New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc.
Wednesday, November 10, 2004


Caries experience may be associated with income,” reports the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Low income, not fluoridation deficiency, predicts more cavities is revealed in newly-released statistics posted 10/25/04 on the CDC’s website (1).



Those states reporting third-graders cavity rates and children living below the federal poverty level indicate that poor children have more cavities – even when water is fluoridated. And, the states with the highest rates of fluoridation don’t have the lowest cavity rates.



For example, CDC statistics show that:



Despite a 60% fluoridation rate, Arkansas has the most third-graders suffering with tooth decay (72%) and the highest number of poor children (45%)



Oklahoma third-graders endure the second worst cavity rate (69%) even though 3/4 of the state is fluoridated. But 41% are poor, the second poorest state on the CDC’s list.



Similarly, 89% fluoridated South Dakota reveals the third worst decay rate (68%) where 41% are poor.



At the low end:



Massachusetts, Maine and Vermont third-graders have the least decay – 49%, 45% and 44%, respectively, and the smallest amount of poor children (26%, 32% and 31%), Fluoridation rates: 63%, 75%, and 54%, respectively.



Additionally, the CDC reports that, while fluoridation numbers improved, cavity experience in two – four-year-olds worsened. (9)



Healthy people have healthy teeth. Ten of the twelve least healthiest (10) states as reported by the United Health Foundation have the most toothless populations (11) when compared to CDC statistics, even though most of those states are heavily fluoridated (12).





“The cavity-prone and toothless are not fluoride-deficient; but are fluoride overdosed. Poor health and/or low income predicts tooth decay,” says lawyer Paul Beeber, President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation. “Fluoridation is a waste of money and is no substitute for a healthy diet and dental care,” says Beeber..



Water engineers dispense fluoride chemicals into 2/3 of Americans via their water supply attempting to prevent tooth decay. However, in the United Kingdom, where only 10% drink fluoridated water, tooth decay rates are equal too or better than those of the U.S.(2) and have declined over the last ten years.(3)



In contrast, U.S. cavity rates increased (4) along with fluoride overdose symptoms, prompting some researchers to suggest that water fluoridation be stopped (5a,b). Cavity rates also increased in heavily fluoridated Australia (2/3 fluoridated) (13) where evidence shows no difference in decay rates between fluoridated water drinkers and non-drinkers (14).



In non-water-fluoridated Finland, Sweden and Holland, tooth decay declined by 92%, 82% and 72% respectively over the past 20 years (15).




In the U.S., U.K. and Australia, lack of money and dental care predicts higher rates of tooth decay – regardless of fluoridation status (6a,b, 13).



By neglecting the poor, organized dentistry helped create an oral health epidemic.(7) Promoting fluoridation may deflect government regulators from forcing dentists to treat poor children.(8) .







References:

(1) U.S. Centers For Disease Control

http://www2.cdc.gov/nohss/IndicatorV.asp?Indicator=2&OrderBy=2



(2) U.S. Centers for Disease Control, Oral Health:
Preventing Cavities, Gum Disease Disease, and Oral Cancers At A Glance 1004
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/aag/aag_oh.htm


(3) National Statistics “Dentinal Decay Children's permanent teeth better than ever” (United Kingdon) http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=973



(4) Wall Street Journal http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2002/03/08/financial1058EST0079.DTL



(5a) “A Quantitative Look at Fluorosis and Fluoride Exposure and Intake of Children Using a Health Risk Assessment Approach,” Environmental Health Perspectives, by Serap Erdal1 and Susan N. Buchanan2, Online 14 September 2004

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2004/7077/7077.pdf



(5b) http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof/_pgg8.php3





(6a) http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof2/_pgg6.php3





(6b) Inequalities in children’s caries experience: the nature and size of the UK problem,” by Nigel B. Pitts, Dental Health Services Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

http://www.dundee.ac.uk/dhsru/cdh/supp151/#2



(7) “FIRST-EVER SURGEON GENERAL'S REPORT ON ORAL HEALTH FINDS PROFOUND DISPARITIES IN NATION'S POPULATION,” News Release, May 2000, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/news/pressreleases/pr_oral_52000.htm



(8) Oregon Dental Association newsletter, April 2004, Volume 9, Number 11 (Page 6)

http://www.oregondental.org/oda/section.cfm?wSectionID=1277



(9) Oral Health Progress Review 3/17/04

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ppt/hpdata2010/focusareas/fa21.ppt

(slide 5)





(10) United Health Foundation “2004 Overall State Health Rankings”

http://www.unitedhealthfoundation.org/shr2004/Findings.html





(11) CDC tooth loss rates by state

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5250a3.htm



(12) CDC’s 2004 Water Fluoridation Statistics By State

http://www2.cdc.gov/nccdphp/doh/synopses/WaterFluoridationV.asp?Year=2004&submit1=+Go+



(13) "Dental Health in State of Decay,"

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Dental-health-in-a-state-of-decay/2004/11/10/1100021883334.html?oneclick=true



(14) "Fluoridation No Benefit, another study shows" http://www.orgsites.com/ny/newyorkstatecoalitionopposedtofluoridation/


(15) "How Other Countries Have Stopped the Rot; THE INTERNATIONAL SOLUTION," Evening Times; Glasgow (UK) Aug 19, 01:49 AM EST




For more information, contact:

Paul Beeber,
President and General Counsel

New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation

nyscof@aol.com

http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof
Paul S. Beeber
Added: Monday November 01, 2004 at 08:28 PM EST
Congratulations for using common sense in voting against water fluoridation. Ingesting fluoride to prevent tooth dacay is like swallowing sunscreen to prevent a sunburn!
Even topical applications of fluoride are hazardous to those with compromised immune systems.
Fluoridating (medicating) public water systems is against the
human rights of those who do not wish to be medicated. See
Article 7 of the International Covenant on political and Civil Rights and the OAS Treaty Article X1 !
And if that's not enough, when the water supply is "fluoridated" with FLUOSILICIC ACID,a labeled Hazardous Waste
product, the public is being used as a FILTER @ 1ppm to release this waste into the environment. What other "prescription" do you know of that is used to flush your toilet,wash your car,water your lawn,bathe in,cook with,etc??
IT'S A SCAM on the public. THINK ABOUT IT and then DO SOMETHING TO STOP IT!
Gerri Sweeney
View All 4 Comments »

email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendlyTop