News   Classifieds   Community   Directory   Marketplace   My Zwire! 
News Search

Advanced search
 Partly cloudy 54°
5 Day Forecast

Saturday 21 November, 2009




 News
 
Top Stories
Local News
State News
Sports
Weather
Farm
Business
Entertainment
Obituaries
Opinion
NEW! Photos
 
 Our Newspaper
 
Contact Us
How to Subscribe
How to Advertise
more...
 Classifieds
 
Classifieds Home
Employment
Real Estate
more...
 Community
 
Community Calendar
Community Websites
 Business Directory
 
Advertisers Index
Discount Coupons
All Categories
more...
 Fun and Games
 
Crosswords
Horoscopes
Classic Games
more...

Madison Daily Leaderhome : news : news : opinion
"Affordable" health care means someone else makes decisions
By JON M. HUNTER, Publisher 07/02/2009
Two words used in the national discussion over health care reform need to be clarified: "affordable" and "access."

They are both good political words, implying that our elected officials will do something to lower prices, perhaps even to zero, and make sure health care is readily available to everyone for their needs. The two words are good to use during elections and on press releases.

But in essence, they both mean that our taxes will pay for health care, and government officials will control it.

Governments, using tax dollars, already pay about half the health care costs in the United States. About 20 percent of the nation is employed by federal, state and local governments, while Medicare, Medicaid and other programs fill up the rest.

The "access" part of the debate intends to provide free health-care for those who don't either pay for it themselves, have an employer who pays it on their behalf, or have it paid through a government program. Estimates assumes between 15 and 25 percent of the population are in this group.

So let's assume that the government -- using our taxes -- will soon be paying the vast majority of health care costs in the U.S. When it does, the next logical step is to take over decision-making.

We often think of receiving government funds as free money, but it usually turns into a loss of control. When South Dakota decided to rely more on state taxes rather than local taxes to finance K-12 education, local school boards lost much of its budgetary control to state legislators.

Health-care is next. As part of the economic stimulus package, Congress set aside $1.1 billion to start figuring what the best treatments are for a variety of ailments, like irregular heartbeat, prostate cancer, back pain and hearing loss. Government officials say they will figure that out, so patients don't waste time and money on poor choices.

Did you notice the words in that last sentence? They said they will research treatments so that we won't waste time doing so. If I have an ailment, am I really wasting time by researching it? Yes, the officials say, because patients will inevitably make poor choices.

Beware of wolves in sheep's clothing. Asking for what seems to be free money will soon result in a loss of control of our own health care treatments.


©Madison Daily Leader 2009

Send us your community news, events, letters to the editor and other suggestions. Now, you can submit birth, wedding and engagement announcements online too!


Copyright © 1995 - 2009 Townnews.com All Rights Reserved.