Home -> News -> News -> Letters to the Editor Wednesday 10 February, 2010
NEWS SEARCH
Advanced search

     Photo Gallery
     News
 
  Top Stories
  Liberty Fest 2008
  Sports
  Business
  Entertainment
  Community News
  Crime
  Editorial
  Obituaries
  Sign Me Up!
  Past Issues
  News Archive
  Weather
  Anniversaries
  Upcoming Meetings
  Courthouse Report
  Barron County Dispatch Log
  Chetek Police Report
  Letters to the Editor
  School News
  Class Reunions
  Birth Announcements
  Weddings,Engagements
  Health
  Religious Stories
     Contact Us
     Classifieds
     Community
     Links
     Business Directory
     Our Newspaper
     Administrative
     Fun and Games
     Consumer Guide
     Personal Finance
     Lifestyles



Letters to the Editor
Public option is the best option:
By: Robert B. Clipper, Bruce September 16, 2009
Email to a friend    Voice your opinion   
This letter concerns the war over health care and is my cogent analysis of the problem. Why does anybody worry that the government will choose your doctor? I always had my doctor chosen by the hospital or place where my treatment was started and otherwise kept that doctor or found one by selection from those in my area usually restricted to one or two available. Urgency chooses for us.
We need a public option because the insurance companies always continue to escalate the prices of everything for maximum profit, not in any way for efficiency. Medicare works well and spends less by at least 30 percent over the private insurance management. Without a public control and oversight of the system, prices will continue to escalate until nobody can afford health care but the rich.

The idea for cooperative insurance and even cooperative at-cost or low-cost clinics is a good solution but must have oversight set upon health care for everyone managed by the government because skyrocketing profits for stockholders has not worked and never will.

There must be a basic health care for all guaranteed by the government which can be supplemented by insurance for 100 percent coverage, just as we now have with Medicare. There will be plenty of income for insurance companies to provide supplemental coverage. I pay more than $3,000 for 100 percent coverage now, and this payment more than covers my necessary health care cost with profit for the insurance companies. Younger people who will be in the system will obviously require less care at lower cost and keep costs low.

Having people line up at the emergency rooms of hospitals is costly, and periodic visits to a doctor will eventually reduce costs overall. We need government controls to keep tighter management for maximum efficiency. There must also be use of low-cost clinics with efficient management. Obama's idea for digital records can also greatly reduce unnecessary repeated MRI scans and other inefficiencies and help reduce costs.


©The Chetek Alert 2010
Email to a friend    Voice your opinion    Top

Send us your community news, events, letters to the editor and other suggestions. Now, you can submit birth, wedding and engagement announcements online too!

Copyright © 1995 - 2010 All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement

Advertisement