• Home
  • News
    • Towns
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Opinions
    • Blog Central
  • Entertainment
    • Fun and Games
  • Life
  • Marketplace
    • Jobs
    • Autos
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Rentals
    • Shopping
    • Special Sections
    • Place An Ad
CTCentral.com
Home : News : News : Front Page
Delivery
CT Central Network
CTCentral.com
NewHavenRegister.com
NewBritainHerald.com
BristolPress.com
RegisterCitizen.com
MiddletownPress.com
PlayNewHaven.com
RegistroCT.com
ConnecticutMag.com
Other CT Publications
All Publications
Clear 49°5 Day Forecast
Marketplace-NEW!!
Jobs
Real Estate
Rentals
Autos
Shopping
Special Sections
Yellow Pages
Classifieds
Place An Ad
SERVICES
Subscribe
Place an Ad
Photo Galleries
Contact Us
MEMORIES
Obituaries
Home : News : News : Front Page
FROM THE PUBLISHER: Quality of directors affects groups large and small
By MATT DeRIENZO
10/13/2008
email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendly
Criticism from both sides of the controversy swirling around the departure of Torrington High School Principal Dr. John Metallo has centered on the role of the Board of Education.

Supporters of the former principal have criticized the board for not putting tighter reins on the school superintendent, and presumably, failing to overrule some of the decisions she has made about the day-to-day operations of the school district.

Supporters of the superintendent have criticized Board of Education members for involving themselves - and interfering - in operational decisions. The board should focus on policy, they argue, and leave decisions about hiring, firing, discipline, etc., to the superintendent, who is effectively the school district's "CEO."
I'm not foolish enough to stick my nose into that fight, but will say this:

The quality of boards of directors and the responsibilities and roles of the people who serve on them has been one of the most overlooked issues facing organizations from the largest corporations in the world to the smallest of local nonprofit organizations.

The issue received some attention briefly after Enron and WorldCom crashed and burned, out of nowhere, and people thought to ask where their corporate boards of directors, which included well-known and highly respected leaders of business and government, had been as these companies placed their stockholders' and employees' futures on a foundation as flimsy and deceptive as a house of cards.

That brought new scrutiny and regulations relating to the ratio of "outside directors" on a publicly traded corporate board compared to "insiders," or full-time employees of the company such as CEOs and CFOs whose own livelihood was theoretically so wrapped up in the decisions made about the company that they needed an "outside" board of directors to keep the focus on always doing what will benefit shareholders first.

Enron, WorldCom, the complicity of their accounting firms and the resultant Sarbanes Oxley act also brought a huge new emphasis on the role that the audit subcommittees of boards of directors should play.

But here we are again. Major financial institutions across the country and the world are collapsing. Where were the boards of AIG and Lehman Brothers as the CEOs of these companies were apparently driving the train off a cliff?
Why do the executives and retired CEOs who populate some of these boards allow decisions to be made or organizational problems to fester that they never would have stood for when running their own company?

On the other hand, there are plenty of examples out there of boards full of Type A personalities jumping on the first misstep a company's CEO makes, never allowing stability of top operational leadership to take hold. The CEO of Walgreens stepped down last week after only two years on the job after the company had to withdraw from a bidding war with CVS to acquire a small regional drugstore chain in California.
Back in Torrington, and in many communities like it across the country, the boards of nonprofit agencies and government entities that are so crucial to the quality of life of the population are mostly winging it.
Some wing it very well. Others' success are based largely on the strength of their CEO or executive director. And recruiting and supporting that top operational employee is, in itself, one of the most important functions of a board of directors. Think, for example, about the Torrington Development Corp.'s recent choice of former New Hartford First Selectman Bill Baxter as its interim executive director.
But the fact is there's no class they send you to, or magic instruction manual, that tells you how to be a good board member. And there's no formal recruitment program. The job typically falls to the super-volunteers, the fraction of a percentage point of community members who are involved in "everything," members of everything, and at the end of the day make sure that the money gets raised, the envelopes get stuffed and the doors stay open.
Over-volunteering can, theoretically, be a disservice to some of these boards, as the super-involved person is able to do barely more than show up for meetings at some of the umpteen different organizations they serve with. And the focus falls more on getting that volunteer work done than making sure that the structure, policy and long-term financial strength of the organization are on solid footing.
But if not them, who will do it? There are plenty of vacancies already on boards and commissions in Torrington and surrounding communities.
It would only take a few dozen more of the thousands of businesspeople, retirees and others who have expertise and at least some time to offer to step up and be involved to allow those who already are to step back and provide more meaningful focus on the challenges our local organizations are facing.
Matt DeRienzo is publisher of The Register Citizen. He can be reached at 860-489-3121, ext. 350, or by -email at mderienzo@registercitizen.com.


©The Register Citizen 2009

Submit your comment now
Comment Title:
Submit your comments on the article in the space below:
Your Name:
Your City & State:  
Your Email Address: (required)
What's This?
In order to verify you are not a spam-bot you will need to use the image above.
The addition of the flashing numbers above =
By submitting your comment, you acknowledge that you have read and accept the Terms and Conditions of this site.
Reader Comments
Added: Monday October 13, 2008 at 02:49 PM EST
"No people can be great who have ceased to be virtuous" Dr. Samuel Johnson
"But some of the nasty, and dare I say, immature ways public officials have been publicly attacked, is -- well -- simply wrong, ineffective & petty. How can we expect the competent, reliable people we have to continue? How can we expect competent, reliable people in our community to step up to volunteer? Petty, public, pre-adolescent approaches to problem-solving -- is this the example we want to set for our children?"

My response is that all sides of the picture are responsible. One classification is the "want to be politicians" volunteers for some commissions and boards who are more interested in pursuing their own interests, or of propping up special interests then being of service to the community.
The second classification is that so many of our elected politicians are more interested in power and have forgotten the words "service to the community" that they supposedly represent.
The third scenario is that some people feel un-empowered and think that gives them the right to be petty, rude, disrespectful and sometimes downright abusive. Whilst this is not the way most of our community is, those few that are vocal and loud in their brutish comment/st seem to predicate an impression that one remembers, as opposed to reason or fact. A human condition perhaps, still a damn shame!
Service to the community should be the only standard that all follow.
I am convinced that much of the "ineffective and petty" responses mentioned above are driven by so much hate mongering in our media, and by a lack of courtesy (respect) because of the dissolution of traditional values. I recall the old-fashioned words "common courtesy" with a sense of nostaglia.
G., Working and Living in this beautiful area
Added: Monday October 13, 2008 at 07:20 AM EST
you only have to read this paper to know why people don't volunteer more......
Look at what happens to volunteer (or elected) board members in our communities of Torrington & Winsted.

Does the job ad read "Do you want to volunteer many hours, and give of your own time in exchange for public ridicule? Do you wish to have your hands tied, and recommendations denied or worse yet ignored? Do you want to later be forced to resign amid public humiliation because you didn't do what was denied or ignored or not funded? Do you wish to be lambasted for everything you say and do? Do you wish to check your email every 35 seconds be to sure you receive your email before the press reaches you about the latest scandal? Then this is the job for YOU."

Yes, superintendents need to be held accountable by boards, laws & policies need to be followed (or changed via appropriate means), and boards need to be held accountable as well, in part by the constituents they serve. But some of the nasty, and dare I say, immature ways public officials have been publicly attacked, is -- well -- simply wrong, ineffective & petty. How can we expect the competent, reliable people we have to continue? How can we expect competent, reliable people in our community to step up to volunteer? Petty, public, pre-adolescent approaches to problem-solving -- is this the example we want to set for our children?

"Please, I want that job. Please let ME volunteer!"

NO THANK YOU!
fed up & disgusted, Torrington, CT

email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendlyTop
Other Front Page
Town Talk and Blog Central
BLOG: The Torrington Guy
BLOG: BLOG: The Publisher's Desk
More Front Page
EMAIL DELIVERY
CONTACT US  •  ADVERTISE WITH US  •  OUR PUBLICATIONS  •  PRIVACY POLICY
NEWSPAPERS IN EDUCATION
© 2008 The Register Citizen - a Journal Register Property. All Rights reserved.